Geostatistics and Geoinformatics in the analysis of ‘crime against women’ in Tiruchirappalli city, Tamil Nadu

P Mary Santhi; Balaselvakumar; K Kumaraswamy

doi:10.53989/bu.ge.v7i2.8

Article

VIEWS 777
PDF 317

Geo-Eye

DOI: 10.53989/bu.ge.v7i2.8

Year: 2018, Volume: 7, Issue: 2, Pages: 32-37

Original Article

Geostatistics and Geoinformatics in the analysis of ‘crime against women’ in Tiruchirappalli city, Tamil Nadu

P Mary Santhi¹, Balaselvakumar², K Kumaraswamy³

¹Research Scholar, Department of Geography, Periyar E.V.R. College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, 620 023
²Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Periyar E.V.R. College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, 620 023
³CSSR Senior Fellow, Department of Geography, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, 620024

Received Date:27 June 2018, Accepted Date:12 November 2018

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to understand the relationship between demographic parameters and crime occurrences against women in Tiruchirappalli city. Seven variables of crime against women have been incorporated by statistics factor analytical technique with the 2011 census of population, sex ratio, literacy ratioand work participation rate. Four components have been derived namely Gender component-I, Personal Crimes and Literacy component-II, Molestation and Total Population component – III and Work Participation and Sex Ratio- component - IV. Woraiyur police station in Srirangam range followed by Palakkarai police station in Fort range have associated with the components of I, II & III determine the high rate of crime against women in the city. The occurrences of cruelty by husband were of great concern, especially in Srirangam range.

Keywords: Crime against women; Demographic parameters; statistical components; police stations; Geostatistics and Geoinformatics

References

Beirne P. Adolphe Quetelet and the Origins of Positivist Criminology. American Journal of Sociology. 1987;92(5):1140–1169. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228630
Hackett M. Domestic Violence Against Women: Statistical Analysis of Crimes Across India”. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 2011;42(2):267–288.
Bott S, Guedes A, Goodwin MM, Mendoza JA. Violence Against Women in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Comparative Analysis of Population-based Data from 12 Countries . Washington. Pan American Health Organization. 2012.
Harries KD. Mapping Crime: Principles and Practice. US Department of Justice, Washington.
Farrell G. Crime Concentration Theory. Crime Prevent Commune Safe. 2015;17(4):233–248.
Grove L, Farrell G, Farrington D, Johnson S. Preventing Repeat Victimization: A Systematic Review, The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention, Stockholm. 2012.
Bursik R, Grasmick GH. Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Community Control. New York. Lexington Books. 1993.
Annan K. Women’s Role in Decision-Making - Central to Progress of Humankind. 2006.. Press Release (OBV/542-WOM/1547), United Nations, New York
Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic. 1988.
Andresen MA. Crime Measures and the Spatial Analysis of Criminal Activity. The British Journal of Criminology. 2006;46(2):258–285. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi054
Chang Y, Choi SB, Lee J, Jin WC. Number of Crimes: Is the Relationship Superlinear? International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change. 2018;9(1):26–39.
Johnson S. A Brief History of the Analysis of Crime Concentration”. European Journal of Applied Mathematics. 2010;21(1):349–370.

Copyright

© 2018 Mary Santhi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Published By Bangalore University, Bengaluru, Karnataka