Urban trends: A case study of Karnataka

G Ramanna; Ashok D Hanjagi

doi:10.53989/bu.ge.v8i1.6

Article

VIEWS 425
PDF 444

Geo-Eye

DOI: 10.53989/bu.ge.v8i1.6

Year: 2019, Volume: 8, Issue: 1, Pages: 20-24

Original Article

Urban trends: A case study of Karnataka

G Ramanna¹, Ashok D Hanjagi²

¹Research Scholar, Department of Geography, Bangalore University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
²Professor & Chairman, Department of Geography, Bangalore University, Bangalore, Karnataka,
India

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Towns and cities play a greater role in regional development of a state or country. A settlement with more than 75% of pupulation other than agricultural activites can be termed as town. Karnataka has good number of towns and cities but lack in million cities. Bangalore is the only million city, it is located in the most southern part of Karnataka. Urban influence is of varying nature, it may have its influence of agriculture, on industry, on administration and also on certain services like medical, cultural including educational, recretional, etc. The secondary data are collected from various government organizations the trend in which the towns and cities of Karnataka expanded and the urban agglomeration in the 2011 is given emphasis in this paper.

Keywords: Urban agglomeration; urban primacy; urbanization

References

Benfield. National Resources Defnce Council. 1999.
Bhattacharya B. Urbanisation and Human Development in West Bengal: A District Level. 1998.
Government of India. 2001., Census of India, General Population tables, States and Union Territories. Government of India. 2001.
Bhagat RB, Mohanty S. Emerging Pattern of Urbanization and The Contribution of Migration. Asian Population Studies. 2009;5(1):5–20. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17441730902790024
AK. Trends and Patterns of Urbanisation and their economic implications. India Infrastrucuture. 2006.
Brody S. Measuring thr adoption of local sprawl reduction planning policies in Florida. Journal of Planning and Education Research. 2006;p. 294–310.
Brueckner J. Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and Remedies. International Regional Science Review. 2000;23(2):160–171.
Government of Karnataka., 1971., Census of India, General Population tables. Mysore: Government of Karnataka. 1971.
Brody SD. Ecosystem Planning in Florida: Solving Regional Problems through Local Decision Making. UK. Ashgate Press. 2008.
Garnier CB. Urban Geography. New York. John Wiley. 1967.
GRAAM., 2014., Performance Evaluation Study of NRHM in Karnataka. Mysore: Grass Root Research Advocacy Movement. 2014.
Burchell RW. The costs of sprawl revisited. Washington DC. National Academy Press. 1998.
Hirschhorn JS. Environment, Quality of Life, and Urban Growth in the New Economy. Environmental Quality Management. 2001;10(3):1–8. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tqem.1000
Government of Karnataka., 2005., Human Development Report. Government of Karnataka. 2005.
BMR. Urban Geography - A Text Book. New Delhi. Concept Publishing Company. 2002.

Copyright

© 2019 Ramanna & Hanjagi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Published By Bangalore University, Bengaluru, Karnataka